(Photo via Good Free Photos)
The town I live in goes in for public art in a big way, which is very nice except that the piece of public art nearest my home is a statue I don’t like. Actually, it’s a statue I hate. This statue is—unusually, these days—representational, and I like representational art. I should like this statue. Instead, it evokes an active loathing in my soul.
My daughter—who’s an artist—would probably tell me that this very loathing is the proof that, as a work of art, the statue is a success. The principal function of art, she tells me, is to make people uncomfortable. (I think that’s what she said.) Whether that’s true or not, this statue that I hate has been useful to me. It’s helped me to write better dialogue.
The statue is of a young woman who looks like she might be waiting for something. I’ve always assumed she was waiting for a bus because a) the statue is positioned at a bus-stop; and b) she looks a little bored. Not a lot bored; just a little. It’s life-sized, which means the young woman is taller than I am because almost everybody is, and she’s dressed very casually in jeans, a t-shirt, and a hoodie with the hood down and resting on her shoulders. A light breeze stirs her hair. Her head is turned slightly to the side, and she stares down the road, watching passively for the bus, which on this particular route runs every hour, seven days a week, except on Christmas and New Year’s when the buses in this town don’t run at all. Every detail of her face and clothing (her hands are concealed in her pockets) is absolutely correct and in perfect proportion. Even the aglets on the ends of her shoelaces are visible. She looks, in short, exactly like a slightly bored young woman of between 18 and, say, 25; casually dressed; who is waiting for a bus—and who has been dipped in bronze.
I’ve lived here for sixteen years, which means (if I’ve done the math right, and allowing for days off) that I’ve driven by the Statue I Don’t Like at least 4000 times on my way to work. I’ve loathed it every time. But sometime about viewing #2847, I realized why I didn’t like it; and that the statue had a lesson to teach.
I used to spend a lot of time trying to make characters in my books converse with each other in a way that I considered to be absolutely true-to-life. Grammar, vocabulary, idiom—I wanted them all exactly those of real people. Nobody popping off an “oh, very well” in my books, when nobody in real life has said “oh, very well” for a hundred years. No siree. And the dialogue I produced that way was the literary equivalent of Bronze Bus-Watcher. Go to any bus-station and see her equivalent in the flesh; listen to the conversations going on around you and hear my characters’ dialogue.
So when it comes to statuary and dialogue, I conclude, true-to-life is overrated. True-to-life is an undistinguished young woman rendered faithfully but soullessly in bronze. Good dialogue—not the stuff I write; but I’m working on it—is Michelangelo’s David. One hand is bigger than the other, and his eyes don’t track; but you certainly can’t go down to any old bus-stop and see him.
I’m working now on making dialogue that is untrue to life; but, I hope, more revelatory of my characters’ souls. I’m big into baring souls. Souls are more interesting to me than even plots—which is saying quite a lot. This new way is hard for me; but I like it. I can make my characters say anything I want them too now, even if it’s something nobody in “real life” ever has said, or would.
So far, they have never wanted to say, “Oh, very well.”